Archived
April 10, 2011

 

YES, I SAID IT FIRST.

Weekly Article and Sports Magazine
est. 2006


www.yesisaiditfirst.com

Sunday, April 10, 2011
Volume 10; Article Number 12
Issue #243


MOST ACCURATE POLL

By Patrick Morand, Senior Editor, “YES, I SAID IT FIRST”

What is a “poll”?

Webster’s Dictionary states that a poll can be “...a counting of votes cast...or canvassing of persons selected at random to obtain information or opinions (to be analyzed)”.

Only one major North American sport that I am aware of decides its champion at the end of the season by a poll.

That sport is NCAA College Football, but their poll is not really a true poll because of two things.

First, it’s not a true poll because the voters are not determined at random.

The NCAA selectors are coaches from within the sport that are asked the question of who is the best team and while their answers are qualified they can hardly be considered random because they are handpicked.

Second, in college football where there is not a large playoff system they rely on the various polls to assist in ranking teams throughout the last two months of the season.

Teams that do well in the polls get invited to the best college bowl games, but the two teams perceived as the very best, that score highest in the right polls get to play in the bowl game reserved to determine a national champion.

There is often dispute about the football championship because to get to the bowl games no two teams take the same roads. They all play different opponents and the question of who is best is often voted on based on significant bias, until the very last poll is taken.

In the final poll after the bowl games are played the voters are obliged to name the winner of the most important bowl game as the number one team. So the result of the most important question is already directed so as not to undermine the significance of that BCS Championship game.

Which makes one wonder why they need a final poll if the correct answer is determined before the question is asked, but that is how it works in college football? – But that is not the way it works in college basketball.

CONSENSUS NUMBER ONE

Even though college basketball has the most anticipated national tournament that finishes with the much hyped Final Four championship between two teams that progress unscathed through a field of 68 contenders that were determined by a series of polls, there is still a final poll taken by USA Today/ESPN that just muddies the waters.

Usually there is consensus that the team that wins the Final Four is the number one team, but in this year’s final poll taken following albeit one of the worst played championship games ever there was dissention with one of the thirty-one voters.

Despite that the University of Connecticut Huskies came out of ninth place in their conference, rolled through their conference tournament to qualify for the NCAA Tournament, and outlasted all the top regional seeds on the way to besting Butler University 53-41 in the finale one coach actually put forth that they were not the best team.

Mike Adras has been the head basketball coach for thirteen years at Northern Arizona which plays division I basketball in the Big Sky Conference. Adras has been his conference’s lone representative in the coaches’ poll since 2006.

Half way through each season the basketball polls begin ranking the top basketball teams. Polls are used to influence the tournament invitation committee at selection time because the values from the coaches’ poll are factored in the Real Time College Basketball Ratings (RPI).

In part the poll that Adras and others have say in all year determines the seeds in the final tournament to crown a champion.

I am not quite sure why Adras and the others in the coaches poll are asked a day after the Final Four to vote one more time.

It seems kind of silly to have this process to assist in determining seeding for a tournament to crown a winner and then ask again after that winner is crowned who the top team actually is.

While it may be nice to be ranked number one it is not as glorious as actually winning the games to become number one which Connecticut did last Monday when they beat Butler.

The polls are nice all season, and lead to good water cooler discussion when teams with similar records are ranked in January or early March. Those ranks sometimes even affect who qualifies for the big tournament so there is special interest with teams that are on the bubble trying to make their case to get in.

Some poll voters seem to rank teams higher based on the quality of their victories, some just look at stats or who have the best players.

Adras considered mainly results throughout the season apart from the playoffs for the final coaches’ poll when he answered what should be a snapshot question with a more general response.

BODY OF WORK

Adras decided against choosing Connecticut who had just won the tournament, and maybe he did so because they had some fortuitous breaks along the way like not having to play any number one seeds. Instead of Connecticut Adras picked Ohio State as his number one team - Ohio State was ranked at the top all season but lost to Kentucky in the East Regional finals.

Adras explained on ESPN Radio’s Doug Gottlieb Show that he chose Ohio State as his number one team because he evaluated the “total body of work” of that program for the year as superior to any other.

Ohio State was 34-3 in the season, and though they lost in the championships they were still in his opinion the best team.

Adras was the only voter to not pick Connecticut in that poll.

A silly poll that can only be looked at as a poll designed to cause controversy on the day after a real champion was determined.

I am certain that Ohio State, and other talented teams that Adras liked better than Connecticut, did not feel any better about their squandered opportunities because of any solace found in this next day poll.

Sports are all about winning championships not about winning anointments.

The NCAA is a world of things that never make sense.

While the biggest complaint about college football is the absence of a real playoff where people wish they could actually have some tournament system to avoid poll disputes, we ironically let some coaches’ poll in college basketball to add a wrinkle of doubt even before they truck away the hardwood floor from their title game.

It’s not fair to Connecticut that won in spite of the odds to have lustre removed from their victory, no matter how bizarre, because we want a second opinion.

SNAPSHOT OF OPINIONS

I am not against Adras’ reasoning as much as I am against the over use of polls.

A poll is only a snapshot of opinions at any point in time and should never be the final word. A poll like this is very narrow in reference. There are lots of assumptions made.

Just like in a political poll there can be biases to a style of play or a particular conference and maybe certain teams have reputations that help them score better than they deserve. Coaches that vote always claim that they are ignorant in some respect and not completely in the know about issues that face every team they rank.

They don’t get to watch every team play.

In Adras’ final selection two teams were given credit for having talent even if it did not help them over the hump when they had everything on the line.

The fact that not just one top seed died before the Final Four, but all four were dispatched early and an eight seed faced a three in the Final means that when it came to ranking probably too much attention was paid to talent and record.

Adras aside, Connecticut did actually win the final poll because most voters still believe winning the NCAA tournament says more about a team than its record does.

The NCAA Tournament is hard to win.

The teams with the best records, Ohio State and Kansas lost at the wrong times, while Connecticut won at the most important times.

Connecticut started the season hot. They won 16 out of 18 games in that opening stretch and they defeated teams which would later seed higher than them in the NCAA tournament. Their two early losses were against Notre Dame and Pittsburgh teams that morphed to become the class of their Big East Conference. Pittsburgh (like Kansas and Ohio State) won their way to a top seed.

Connecticut’s poll strength was damaged by a short two week stretch where they lost most of their games in late January and early February.

They were on the bubble to make the NCAA tournament, and were all but written off with their 32-9 record as long shots to qualify.

They finished ninth in their conference, but reeled off five straight sudden death wins at Madison Square Garden to claim their conference tournament to earn an automatic seed in March Madness.

CONNECTICUT NOT LUCKY

Clutch wins over other teams that were going to the 68 team national tournament were part of that weekend in New York.

Connecticut got past Pittsburgh, Syracuse, Georgetown, and Louisville in their sprint. Some of those teams still seeded higher than the Huskies in the tournament because the voters were not convinced that Connecticut wasn’t just “lucky”.

What does a team have to do to shake the lucky tag?

Do as Connecticut and run the table to win the National Championship - the ultimate prize of college basketball. It’s all they could do to overcome the label. Everyone expected a letdown that never came.

It meant that Connecticut would win 11 games in a row over teams mostly ranked in polls above them. Their month of winning should have made a bigger statement to voters like Adras, but they will happily take the rings over the acclaim.

It is much easier to make the case for Connecticut to be number one than avoid it if you put a premium on showing up for big wins over big opponents at the right time.

They had to beat hot teams if not ranked teams to win the whole thing. Hot teams are usually the hardest to stop in basketball, especially when opponents are buoyed by the confidence that they just defeated teams at the top of the polls.

The key victory might have been when Connecticut topped Kentucky in the semi-final since the game was defensive and close throughout it ended 56-55. Kentucky was the team that kept Ohio State out of the Final Four.

Or maybe their victory over upstart Arizona 65-63 was the biggest to propel Connecticut into the Final Four?

Arizona was rolling off an upset of defending champions, Duke, to get that far.

But perhaps the win over San Diego State in the sweet sixteen may have been the best tale of what Connecticut was capable of because voters like Adras had SD State ranked in the top five all year and their 34-3 record was the same as Ohio State. Connecticut still handed San Diego a 74-67 pink slip out of the tournament extending a winning run to eight games.

If you were to ask me, not a Huskies fan, based on their whole “body of work” Connecticut did it right. They started fast, beat good teams, and overcame their midseason lull by winning all the important games in sequence against whomever they faced.

And we know they hail from a deep conference dotted with a history of title teams and had to earn it.

The Big East has 16 member schools and all but one has at one time or another been in a Final Four. Five national champions have been crowned out of the Big East and in 2011 the Big East set a tournament record for number of teams that were invited to compete.

That needs to be considered under the “body of work” argument.

HOT TEAM AT THE RIGHT TIME

In 2011 the Connecticut men’s basketball team clearly was the hottest team at the right time and was hardly threatened in the championship.

The whole purpose of the NCAA Tournament field of 68 is to settle the dispute at the top of the polls. This year it settled that the handful of teams with fewer than 9 regular campaign losses were not as good in the pressure setting as one that had 9 losses.

Teams in the tournament rose to the occasion to defeat Kansas, Pittsburgh, Duke and Ohio State because they had game plans that were executed well, and yes Connecticut did ultimately benefit because they did not have to directly face any of those teams at the big dance.

Connecticut still did not fall victim to the same perils.

NCAA polls rarely take into account what really happens out on the court in the first part of the season, and they probably don’t need to. Basketball teams that win consistently in the winter months stay high in the polls.

Connecticut’s season dispels the normal. Most good teams struggle before it matters and then coast into conference championships not having to worry they might be passed over by the big tournament selection committee.

This year Connecticut played super when it didn’t matter, took a pause that almost cost them any postseason action, and then were forced to win out for as far as they could go.

If they want to have a poll the day after the champion is crowned on the hardwood perhaps they should also amuse us with a Halloween poll or a November early season poll when every team has played just a few games. It is just as corny, but that might plant a few teams in the discussion so they might not be overlooked when it matters.

If a poll is just opinion, then on any day someone will have an opinion that differs from the mass opinion. The naysayer in the case of Adras became a major news event.

Adras’ nay vote was spun by ESPN and others as a vote against the way the NCAA determines a basketball champion when it really was not intended to be that.

People for years have decried that the body of work of any contending team can be one and done in college basketball, and many teams as qualified as Connecticut with nine losses never even get a chance to compete because so many automatic qualifiers from lesser conferences do get in.

The significance of the poll question is smaller in basketball than in football at the college ranks. There is just no way that a team with Connecticut’s credentials makes the discussion in football because all the teams in the bowl games of big football are teams with near unblemished records.

If they had a playoff system of merit in football then a team which had a few bad weeks might go on an incredible run like is possible in basketball.

Still people seem to want to chalk it up to fluke when it does happen.

THE FINAL JUDGE

It is important though that the polls which have their place in helping to sort out the field do not themselves become the focus.

Where they might be referred to as the final judge in place of a performance of sweat and hard tears that actually happen on the court we need to draw a line.

If you want a power ranking or preseason poll to rank some talent, coaching acumen or team expectations then knock yourself out.

However, when the herd of opinion shrouds over to the validity of what is really happening in a game, devaluing the clear result of a tournament played out in front of all to see then it is time to put the pen down, stop evaluating and start respecting real victory.

No poll should be greater than the event for which it opines.

In politics they say the only poll that counts is the real one on election day, so then in sports the championship game is the poll above all polls and the only one that really matters.

Congratulations to the University of Connecticut for being #1 in men’s basketball for 2011.

YES, I SAID IT FIRST is a weekly Internet article
from the Media Division of OJC-Inc.

TAFriendTap the mail button to share this article with a friend!

  Site Map